Movement of floors caused by occupant
activities can present a serious serviceability problem if not properly
considered and prevented by the design of the structural system. Humans are
very sensitive vibration sensors – vertical floor movement of as little as
forty thousandths of an inch can be very annoying. Post-construction repairs of
floors that vibrate are always very expensive, and sometimes cannot be done
because of occupancy limitations. This reinforces the necessity of addressing
potential vibration problems in the original design.
The response of individuals to floor motion depends on the environment, occupant age, and location. People are more sensitive in quiet environments, such as a residence or quiet office, as compared to a busy shopping mall. The elderly are more sensitive than young adults, and sensitivity appears to increase when sitting as compared to standing or reclining.
Stiffness and resonance are dominant
considerations in the vibration serviceability design of steel floor structures
and footbridges. The first known stiffness criterion appeared nearly 170 years
ago. In 1828, an English carpenter named Tregold published a book on carpentry
writing that girders over long spans should be "made deep to avoid the
inconvenience of not being able to move on the floor without shaking everything
in the room." The traditional stiffness criterion for steel floors limits
the live load deflection of beams or girders supporting plastered ceilings to
span/360. This limitation, along with restricting span-to-depth ratios of
members to 24 or less, have been widely applied to steel-framed floor systems
in an attempt to control vibrations, but with limited success.
Traditionally, soldiers "break
step" when marching across bridges to avoid large, potentially dangerous,
resonant vibrations. Until recently, resonance had been ignored in the design
of floors and footbridges. Approximately 30 years ago problems arose with the
vibrations induced by walking on steel-joist supported floors that had
satisfied traditional stiffness criteria. Since that time much has been learned
about the loading function due to walking and the potential for resonance. More
recently, new rhythmic activities, such as aerobics and high impact dancing, have
caused serious floor vibrations due to resonance.
A number of analytical procedures have
been developed which allow a structural designer to assess the floor structure
for occupant comfort for a specific activity and for suitability for sensitive
equipment. Generally, the analytical tools require the calculation of the first
natural frequency of the floor system and the maximum amplitude of
acceleration, velocity, or displacement for a reference activity or excitation.
An estimate of the damping in the floor is also generally required. A human
comfort scale or sensitive equipment criterion is then used to determine whether
the floor system meets serviceability requirements. Some of the analytical
tools incorporate limits on acceleration into a single design formula whose
parameters are estimated by the designer.
Before presenting a technical
explanation of floor design principles, basic terminology is listed and
explained. A review of this terminology will greatly assist in the
understanding of the structural design principles that follow.
Basic Vibration Terminology
Dynamic Loadings. Dynamic loadings
can be classified as harmonic, periodic, transient and impulsive as shown in
Figure 18. Harmonic or sinusoidal loads are usually associated with rotating
machinery. Periodic loads are caused by rhythmic human activities such as
dancing and aerobics, and by impactive equipment. Transient loads occur from
movement of people and include walking and running. Single jumps and heel-drop
impacts are examples of impulsive loads.
Period and Frequency.
Period
is the time, usually in seconds, between successive peak excursions in
repeating events. Period is associated with harmonic (or sinusoidal) and
repetitive time functions as shown in Figures 18a and 18b. Frequency is the
reciprocal of period and is usually expressed in Hz (Hertz or cycles per seadcond).
Steady State and
Transient Motion. If
a structural system is subjected to a continuous harmonic driving
force (see Figure 18a), the resulting
motion will have a constant frequency and constant maximum amplitude and is
referred to as steady state motion. If a real structural system is subjected to
a single impulse, damping in the system will cause the motion to subside as
illustrated in Figure 19. This is one type of transient motion.
Natural Frequency and
Free Vibration. Natural
frequency is the frequency at which a body or structure
will vibrate when displaced and then quickly
released. This state of vibration is referred to as free vibration. All structures
have a large number of natural frequencies; the lowest or
"fundamental" natural frequency is of most concern.
Damping and Critical
Damping. Damping
refers to the loss of mechanical energy in a vibrating system. Damping is usually expressed as the
percent of critical damping or as the ratio of actual damping to critical damping.
Critical damping is the smallest amount of viscous damping for which a free
vibrating system that is displaced from equilibrium and released comes to rest
without oscillation.
Resonance. If a frequency
component of an exciting force is equal to a natural frequency of the
structure, resonance will occur. At resonance,
the amplitude of the motion can become very large as shown in
Figure 20.
Step Frequency. Step frequency is the
frequency of application of a foot or feet to the floor, e.g., walking, dancing or aerobics.
Harmonic. A harmonic multiple
is an integer multiple of the frequency of application of a repetitive force
(e.g.,multiple of step frequency for human activities or multiple of rotational
frequency of reciprocating machinery). Harmonics can also refer to natural
frequencies, e.g., of strings or pipes.
Mode Shape. When a floor structure
vibrates freely in a particular mode, it moves up and down with a certain configuration
or mode shape. Each natural frequency has a mode shape associated with it.
Figure 21 shows typical mode shapes for a simple beam and for a
slab/beam/girder floor system.
Modal Analysis. Modal analysis refers
to a computational analytical or experimental method for determining the
natural frequencies and mode shapes of structures, as well as the responses of
individual modes to a given excitation.
Spectrum. A spectrum shows the
variation of relative amplitude with frequency of the vibration components that
contribute to the load or motion. Figure 22 is an example of a frequency
spectrum.
Acceleration Ratio. The acceleration of a
system divided by the acceleration of gravity is referred to as the acceleration
ratio. Usually the peak acceleration of the system is used.
Floor Panel. A rectangular plan
portion of a floor encompassed by the span and an effective width is
defined as the floor panel.
Bay. A rectangular plan portion of a
floor defined by four column locations.
Floor Vibration Principles
Although human annoyance criteria for
vibration have been known for many years, it has only recently become practical to apply such
criteria to the design of floor structures. The reason for this is that the
problem is complex, the loading complex, and the response complicated -
involving a large number of modes of vibration. Experience and research have
shown, however, that the problem can be simplified sufficiently to provide
practical design criteria.
Most floor vibration problems involve repeated forces caused by machinery or by human activities such as dancing, aerobics or walking, although walking is a little more complicated than the others because the forces change location with each step. In some cases, the applied force is sinusoidal or nearly so. AISC's Steel Design Guide No. 11: Floor Vibrations Due to Human Activities explains in detail the required engineering calculations and assessment techniques. These techniques use acceleration, as a percent of acceleration due to gravity, to measure human perception of floor movement. For example, the tolerance level for quiet environments, residences, offices, churches, etc. is 0.5 percent of gravity (0.005g).
Figure 23 shows tolerance levels for a
number of situations. Note that the scale is a function of frequency and acceleration.
Also, note that the tolerance acceleration level increases as the environment
becomes less quiet. For instance, the tolerance level for people participating
in aerobics (rhythmic activities) is ten times greater than if they are in a
quiet office. To use the scale, the natural floor frequency and the estimated
acceleration for an activity must be calculated.
The acceleration of a floor system
depends on the activity, the natural frequency for the floor, the amount of
mass that moves when the floor vibrates, and the damping in the floor. Floor acceleration
increases as energy in the activity increases; thus, floor acceleration is
greater for aerobics than for walking. Acceleration decreases with increasing
weight; the acceleration for a lightweight concrete floor will be greater than
that for the same normal weight concrete floor for the same activities.
Acceleration decreases with increasing damping.
Evaluation of a floor system for
potential annoying vibration requires careful estimation of the weight
supported by the floor on a typical day. A fully loaded floor will never be a
problem; most occupant complaints are received when the problem floor is
slightly loaded. The design dead load for mechanical equipment and ceiling
should never be used, nor should the design live load. An estimate of the real
mechanical loading (for instance, 2 psf not 5 psf as may be used for strength
design) and ceiling is required. Recommended live loads in the Floor Vibrations
design guide are 11 psf for office live loading (not 50 psf as used for
strength design), 6 psf for residences, and 0 psf for shopping malls.
Frequency is the rate at which a floor
vibrates and is expressed in cycles per second (Hz). Floor systems generally have
a frequency between 3 and 20 Hz. For a typical steel framed 30 ft by 30 ft
office building bay, the frequency will be in the 5-8 Hz range. Frequency is a
function of span (the longer the span, the lower the frequency) and weight
supported (the heavier the floor and the supported contents, the lower the
frequency). Thus, a floor constructed using normal weight concrete will vibrate
at a lower frequency than the same floor constructed with lightweight concrete.
When the frequency is above 15 Hz, as occurs in very short spans (say less than
15 ft), floor vibrations are generally not felt.
Damping is energy loss due to relative
movement of floor components or fixtures on the floor. Damping causes a freely
vibrating floor system to come to rest and is usually expresses as a percent of
critical damping. Critical damping is the amount of damping required to bring a
vibrating system to rest in one-half cycle. Damping for floors is usually
between 2 percent and 5 percent. The lower value is for floors supporting few
non-structural components, like for open work areas and churches. The larger
value is for floors supporting full-height partitions. A typical office floor
with movable, half-height partitions has about 3 percent damping.
Particular attention should be given
to office floors with open spaces, no fixed partitions, and light loads. This
situation is what results in problem floors if the design is not done
correctly. Also, floors with high design loads (say 125 psf) and light actual
loads (say less than 15 psf) do not have the same amount of damping as floors
designed for normal office loading (say 50 psf). In this case, a lower estimate
of damping should be used (e.g., 1-2 percent).
The design of floors supporting
rhythmic activities, dancing, aerobics, etc. require consideration of the
entire structure, not just the supporting floors. These activities introduce
very high energy levels into the structure and can cause annoying floor motion
quite some distance from the activity area. Aerobics on the 60th floor of a building have
caused excessive floor motion twenty floors below. When a rhythmic activity
floor is located above approximately six stories, column deflections must be
considered.
To avoid annoying vibrations in floors
supporting rhythmic activities, the fundamental natural frequency must be above
frequencies associated with harmonics of the activity and the tolerance
acceleration ratio. The tolerance acceleration ratio is a function of both the
rhythmic activity and the affected occupancy. For instance, when dancing and
dining are considered, the tolerance acceleration ratio is 0.02g. The
tolerance level is increased to 0.05g for participants in lively
concerts or sports events.
To satisfy the criterion, a relatively
large fundamental natural frequency is required. For example, if jumping
exercises are shared with weightlifting with an acceleration tolerance level of
0.02g and floor weight of 50 psf, the required frequency is 10.6 Hz. The
economical solution for this example is lightweight concrete and deep,
lightweight supporting members.
Floors supporting sensitive equipment,
such as operating room equipment, electron microscopes, and microelectronics manufacturing
equipment must be very stiff and heavy. Tolerance levels for this type of
equipment are usually expressed in velocity with numbers like 100 to 8,000
micro-in./second. The means of accommodating sensitive equipment are readily
available, but usually require specialists in this area to produce a
satisfactory design.
Summary
The determination of potentially
annoying floor motion for a proposed design requires careful consideration of the
structural system, the anticipated activities, and the finished space. Art, as
well as science, is required on the part of the designer. The most important
parameter to be determined is the fundamental natural frequency of the floor
structure. This calculation requires a careful estimate of the supported weight
on an average day. Floor system damping, which depends on the components of the
building systems, as well as occupancy furnishings and partitions, also must be
estimated. Finally, an acceleration tolerance criterion must be selected and
compared to the predicted acceleration of the floor structure.
(Design with Structural Steel - A Guide for Architects)

Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar